This thing you do claiming to be logic is quite dizzying.
Please explain again how an employer's right to employ whom he will is BS, and that the proper way to defend the Unspoken Right of Employment is somehow enshrined in the Preamble to the Constitution, and is a manditory duty of any employer who wants to remain a citizen. I swear you can see more penumbras and eminations than a gross of Federal Circuit Judges.
And while you are at it, please document this claim:
Many employers are now claiming the power to regulate an employee's right to own weapons.
< This thing you do claiming to be logic is quite dizzying.
Your inability to read in context is not my problem.
Please explain again how an employer's right to employ whom he will is BS, and that the proper way to defend the Unspoken Right of Employment is somehow enshrined in the Preamble to the Constitution, and is a manditory duty of any employer who wants to remain a citizen. I swear you can see more penumbras and eminations than a gross of Federal Circuit Judges.
I quote the Constitution, & you see penumbras. Try to get it straight.
And while you are at it, please document this claim:
Many employers are now claiming the power to regulate an employee's right to own weapons.
Just a few months ago, - ims,- Weyerhauser in Oklahoma was trying to ban guns in parking lots.
Big flap on FR, and the usual suspects were trying to defend the 'right' of an employer to keep guns out of employee's cars. Look it up. Amusing thread.