Why? Because you disagree with the dissenting opinions? (Which, by the way, argued in effect that the majority decision was an impermissible over-extension of the Supreme Court's jurisdiction and improper judicial activism, both of which are the principal complaints lodged against the Court by many posters here.)
No, not at all--because it shows their political stripe is more important than law. The case went to the federal guidelines of voting and whether it was correct to re-count only certain counties (democrat) and on the face of it, it is only pandering to the left, not substantiated by law. These judges consistently err on the side of the left and only in rare instances do they agree with strict construction. Whether the issue is parental notification, privacy, private ownership, criminal law, police procedures, jerrymandering, I have an opinion on where they go based on their socialist lite, sometimes heavy decisions.