Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
Read the links and get back to me if you still hold that position.

I was wrong. She was charged but not tried. Why not?

37 posted on 04/19/2005 5:24:21 PM PDT by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: stinkerpot65
She was charged but not tried. Why not?

The insider trading case was stayed while the perjury case was tried. I don't know the eventual closure on the insider trading case. It could have been paid (all the SEC wanted was 50 grand, if she was smart, she would have paid that in the first place); or the SEC could have dropped it; or it could be still pending.

I never bothered to look it up. The closure isn't that important. But it is interesting that the [false] meme that she was never charged with insider trading is believed by a substantial majority of the public.

38 posted on 04/19/2005 5:29:41 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson