Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeanWestTexan
Well, the law disagrees with you.

I don't support every law on the books.

135 posted on 05/04/2005 7:05:14 AM PDT by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: Zeroisanumber

"I don't support every law on the books."

Nor I.

But every person has a duty to testify under the law and the common law, except with specially-created privileges. These are very few, being generally: husband-wife, penetent-paster, lawyer-client, and patient-doctor (but not dentist!).

These have been the only privileges-to-not-testify recognized by the law for 1,000 years.

So its more an absence of a law on the books.

While reasonable minds can disagree as to whether such a privilege SHOULD exist, judges have no business creating what the legislature refuses to create, considering the law has been very clear for so long.

This reporter asks the judges to create a new privilege for her. New laws are not the judiciary's job.


136 posted on 05/04/2005 7:15:50 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson