Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RonDog

The cover is clever in its "fair and balanced she isn't" message because of the imbalance of her body in the photograph. Nonetheless, the photograph shows a very feminine, attractive woman in a smart pose (and very smart shoes).

The article is surprisingly balanced, given the source. When reading it, my feathers were ruffled by some allogations against Coulter, but other comments make her out to be the intellectual charmer she is.

That Ann Coulter is seen as polarizing by a number of conservatives doesn't hurt our agenda, really. In my mind, there's a huge difference betweent the shrill butch Hillary or the raghead Barbara Boxer and the attractive and smart Ann Coulter.


17 posted on 04/19/2005 2:02:52 PM PDT by peacebaby (Carpe dune!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: peacebaby
From a previous thread:
To: killjoy

As a photographer, I like the shot a lot.

I don't see anything wrong with the picture other than I think they could have used warmer lighting.



94 posted on 04/18/2005 10:04:59 AM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)

23 posted on 04/19/2005 8:51:32 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson