Posted on 04/18/2005 8:56:59 PM PDT by neverdem
www.gunowners.org
Apr 2005
Monday, April 18, 2005
As early as this week, the U.S. Senate could take up S. 397 -- a measure originally designed to protect gun dealers and manufacturers from frivolous lawsuits.
The bill has been watered down substantially over the years, as pro-gun Senators have worked hard to get additional support for the legislation.
But far more important than what's currently in the bill is what anti-gun senators plan to try to tack onto it. Anti-gun "killer amendments" could include:
* A lock-up-your-safety trigger lock mandate;
* A renewal of the semi-automatic ban, similar to the one which was successfully added to the same bill last year -- a ban which eventually died because of the outpouring of opposition from grassroots gunnies;
* A .50 caliber ban;
* A Lautenberg amendment to match Instant Check applicants against an administration "enemies list";
* A gun show crack-down which would subtly but effectively outlaw gun shows.
As was the case last year, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has the parliamentary tools to block all of these amendments -- if he chooses to use them.
He can use his privileged status to offer innocuous amendments to the bill until no more amendments are in order. This blocking strategy is called an "amendment tree."
Or he can move to shut off debate on the bill before any of the anti-gun amendments have been adopted -- and he can even lay the bill aside until it is time to vote on shutting off debate.
The bottom line is that the bill has not been shown to provide enough of the protection the gun industry really needs for gun owners to swallow a single anti-gun amendment. A pure bill will represent a good step forward. But we must not compromise -- by swallowing anti-gun amendments -- if we want to strengthen our gun rights.
ACTION: Contact Majority Leader Bill Frist. Ask him to use the parliamentary tools at his disposal to block amendments on trigger locks, semi-auto bans, .50 caliber bans, gun show bans, or any attempt to amend S. 397 with anti-gun provisions.
Because Senator Frist is reportedly looking to run for president in 2008, he should be eager to hear your views -- even if you're not a resident of Tennessee.
You can reach Sen. Frist via phone, fax or e-mail. However, non-constituents can only send e-mail by going to his website and filling out the form provided. If you choose to do that, please disregard any automated response you might receive (his office WILL take note of your position). Phone calls are encouraged.
Contact info for Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist:
Phone: 202-224-3344
Fax: 202-228-1264
Webform:
http://frist.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=AboutSenatorFrist.ContactForm
Dear Senator Frist:
When S. 397 comes before the Senate, I urge you, in the strongest terms, to use the parliamentary procedures at your disposal to block the adoption of anti-gun amendments on trigger locks, semi-automatics, gun shows, .50 calibers, or any other gun control measure.
This watered-down bill is a good step forward, but it is NOT worth the adoption of any gun control amendment.
Sincerely,
Defend The 2nd Amendment Through Creative Giving...
As we confront the challenges of the future, we know that the generosity of those who assist us will make all the difference in our success. That's why GOA seeks your long-term support.
Please call 703-321-8585 during regular business hours or e-mail goamail@gunowners.org to request information on how to keep control of your assets and make a gift at the same time through:
Requests for information are confidential and do not represent an obligation.
How many times have cars been used by bank robbers? So, how come the officials at GM aren't in jail. Why haven't we jailed BMW CEO's? Mercedes gang still running loose?
Cars are used in drive-by shootings as well. Robberies, burglary, extortionists, rape, etc etc . IN FACT, cars are almost universally used by all forms of criminals. Not a peep about banning someone from driving after they have committed most types of crimes.
Why? Fairly simple. On can not defend their inalienable rights from an intrusive or out of control government with a car . . .
bump
done
thanx
This fundamental injustice, of liability for the actions of 3rd parties who are not within the control of producers or sellers of products, will destroy the economy if it is not addressed NOW.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.