1 posted on
04/18/2005 10:15:05 AM PDT by
FlyLow
To: FlyLow
The overriding GOP talking point should be that the RATS are denying blacks and minorities deserved promotions.
2 posted on
04/18/2005 10:18:20 AM PDT by
mwl1
To: FlyLow
He can rebuild a heart, but can't give Harry Reid a transfusion of honesty.
3 posted on
04/18/2005 10:19:28 AM PDT by
chambley1
To: FlyLow
Frist will impress me for the first time if he follows the advice of the
Byrd Precedent.
To: FlyLow
The question is, do we have 51 senators that will vote for the change? I know there are about 3 dims that would not filibuster anyway, but does that mean they will support the change? Even if they don't, we are OK so long as no more than 4 pubbies defect on the issue. Any thoughts?
6 posted on
04/18/2005 10:52:01 AM PDT by
Clump
To: FlyLow
"Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is using the Internet to explain why the Senate may change its rules to allow an up-or-down vote on
President Bush's judicial nominees."
And any future President's nominees...
That's what worries me.
7 posted on
04/18/2005 10:53:51 AM PDT by
felixmh
To: FlyLow
I have never doubted for one second that if the roles were reversed the Rats would have ended the filibuster in the first year of their presidents first term and then would have said "quit acting like a bunch of babies crying about it".
The senate is well within its rights to set its rules and why have a majority if your not for something. If your for something then gosh darn it get it done, or get out of the way and let somebody else get it done.
9 posted on
04/18/2005 2:49:13 PM PDT by
wmfights
To: FlyLow
I have lost all faith in the GOP, except maybe for Tom DeLay.
14 posted on
04/21/2005 10:25:15 PM PDT by
Saundra Duffy
( Theresa Marie SCHINDLER - We will NEVER FORGET! - IMPEACH JUDGE GREER!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson