[Clint N. Suhks]

Even the dumbest knuckle dragging Liberaltarian knows it's entirely possible those shirts were disruptive.

Hmm...

saying the practice of perversion is good...NOT DISRUPTIVE.

saying the practice of perversion is wrong...YES DISRUPTIVE.

Did you bump your head before you wrote that? Do you even know what the word "arbitrary" means?

[newgeezer]

Hmm... saying the practice of perversion is good...NOT DISRUPTIVE. saying the practice of perversion is wrong...YES DISRUPTIVE. Did you bump your head before you wrote that?

Are you really so incapable of imagining how, in today's P.C. world -- especially on either coast -- it's entirely possible that one viewpoint would cause disruption while the other would not?

Do you even know what the word "arbitrary" means?

IF the pro-homo expression is NOT disruptive and the anti-homo expression IS disruptive, there's NOTHING ARBITRARY about the application of the policy.

Now, go bump your head on that for a while before you spout off again.