[Reactionary]

"I would hardly call this "new" evidence."

None of it is new evidence. And OKCSubmariner? He was run off this board because of certain people who decided he was a liability.

[LS]

For what it's worth, www.frontpagemagazine.com did a forum a few months ago with Mylroe and two other AQ/Iraq experts. Mylroe sounded TOTALLY convincing . . . until the other guys presented their evidence, then they sounded pretty convincing too.

Worse for the "conspiracy" case, Peter Lance, who is hardly a Clintonite ("1000 Years For Revenge") reports the OKC/Iraq/AQ connection, but concludes that most of the links were tenuous at best and that there is no hard evidence that there is a connection. Now, this guy has connected the dots on EVERYTHING, so if he isn't ready to jump, there must be some serious weaknesses still out there.

And I agree Padilla looks like John Doe #2, and that Nichols/McVeigh were NOT supposed to have had enough expertise to make the bomb. Yet McVeigh went to his death repeating his story that there were no other outsiders, and that's the same story Nichols sticks to; and that's the same conclusion that four juries (two grand juries and two petite juries) in two different states came to.

[mommadooo3]

It's a REAL shame that OKCSubmariner is no longer here. His presentation of info was truly DAMNING of klintler.

WHY was he run off? (it happened during one of my 'net-less periods)

Does anyone have a way to personally contact him?

[softengine]

And OKCSubmariner? He was run off this board because of certain people who decided he was a liability.

I'd be interested in hearing a little more detail on that. Mind FReepmailing me?

My impression was that FR was one of the few outlets where a real effort to out gov. fraud, abuse, etc. was made openly and without fear of reprisals. Am I off base?