Actually I found the Wikipedia a valuable resource for researching the Schiavo case. There wasn't a hint of bias for either side. WikiNews is a great news portal as well.
More weird witch-hunts against perfectly useful stuff (Snopes, Wiki) around here for some reason; apparently anything anywhere on either site that someone disagrees with is cause to condemn the entire site.
I always thought it ran down the middle too.
I enjoy reading Wikipedia from time to time too. It can get pretty addictive, reading one article, then following the links to other articles. As for any perceived bias in articles, Wikipedia has a feature where if someone disagrees with the view of an article, a note is posted at the top of the article in plain view stating that the article is in dispute, and you can follow the linked note to see details.