The left rules the mass media. How is it different on sites like this?
And you're a real dumbass if you think Wikipedia sucks because its founder likes Ayn Rand. Wikipedia sucks because nobody on the right CARES enough to revise it. I've revised Reagan's page on numerous occasions, but it almost instantly reverts because the left's more tenacious about its lying than the right is about maintaining honesty.
Tom DeLay's situation demonstrates the proof of that. RINOs and Pubbies are all scurrying to leftist lies, while the left stands tall in King County and at CBS even after their lies are exposed for even the blind to see.
What is this? The article says "right-wing", so someone writes "left-wing", and then someone else comes around deletes the "left-wing" and writes "moderate democrat".. That is just nuts. I've never heard of Wikipedia, but what you are describing is more akin to this message board, than an encyclopedia. Even here I don't expect that my post can be edited by a poster with a dissenting view. If such were the case, I would visit this site no longer.