To: cardinal4
So the NYT is reviving the old "Bush didnt protect all of Saddams weapons" mantra again. Just like they did the weekend before the election..
Yes, but at the same time it's a tought balancing act with "Saddam wasn't a threat--he was disarmed and helpless." Oh, and am I the only one bothered by the fact that they call Saddam "Mr. Hussein"? That's the same title they give the President (the ever-annoying "Mr. Bush" form of address).
5 posted on
04/16/2005 4:13:06 PM PDT by
Cyclopean Squid
(History remembers only what was, not what might have been.)
To: Cyclopean Squid
I have noticed that. In addition, there was an MSM article about how the kind, gentle, Saddam tends his garden and writes poetry while in custody. Rush had a field day with it..
6 posted on
04/16/2005 4:14:48 PM PDT by
cardinal4
(George W Bush-Bringing a new democracy every term..)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson