Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cardinal4
So the NYT is reviving the old "Bush didnt protect all of Saddams weapons" mantra again. Just like they did the weekend before the election..

Yes, but at the same time it's a tought balancing act with "Saddam wasn't a threat--he was disarmed and helpless." Oh, and am I the only one bothered by the fact that they call Saddam "Mr. Hussein"? That's the same title they give the President (the ever-annoying "Mr. Bush" form of address).
5 posted on 04/16/2005 4:13:06 PM PDT by Cyclopean Squid (History remembers only what was, not what might have been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Cyclopean Squid

I have noticed that. In addition, there was an MSM article about how the kind, gentle, Saddam tends his garden and writes poetry while in custody. Rush had a field day with it..


6 posted on 04/16/2005 4:14:48 PM PDT by cardinal4 (George W Bush-Bringing a new democracy every term..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson