Both sites were demolished WAY too fast for any sort of forensic collection for later examination. WAY too fast.
So, whose posterior was being covered by this?
Mainly, however, it deflected mainstream suburbanite and urbane angst from the Clinton venue and aimed it at rural Christians and others who had read the Constitution and wanted to keep their 'ugly' guns.
Lather, rinse, repeat, the MSM brought the questionable actions of the Federal investigating agencies in Flight 800, the WTC bombing, OK City, Waco, out of the wringer just spotless (in the MSM, that is), and all those nervous people who knew at their core that something diabolical was going on gladly bought the 'official' line and only furtively looked back, if at all.
With this came the onus of "Right winged Extremist" which was now levelled at anyone who had the audacity to question anything the Clintons did. Besides, there was O.J., Bosnia/Kosovo, slaughter in the schools and streets, and any number of other things to point to rather than the provenance of campaign funds, the location of nuclear secrets and guidance system designs, or even the choice of humidors in the Oval Office.
After all, the economy was doing 'fine' (thanks in part to the MSM illusion that nothing was wrong--no terrorists here, nope, nope!), the 'extremists' were back in the shadows, and the gay liberal agenda was moving along....
Thank God that the times have changed, but we must remain eternally vigillant, regardless of what party is in control.
We still have a lot of ground to reclaim just to get back to where we were when Reagan was POTUS.
If that is the case, that would explain why the support columns by the daycare failed when the truck bomb should not have taken them out.
It also means they were, in aggregate, probably as or more powerful than the ANFO bomb in the truck.
If that sort of foul-up was on the Feds, no way they would want to own it.