Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P_A_I
an enforced government neutrality to religion insures "the free exercise thereof".

You have to actually respect religion to enforce the neutrality.

However should they be neutral to methods that work? (*e.g. faith based programs to free people from drug abuse etc.?)

194 posted on 04/16/2005 9:41:52 PM PDT by Terriergal (What is the meaning of life?? Man's chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy him for ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: Terriergal
Perhaps they have finally realized that an enforced government neutrality to religion insures "the free exercise thereof".

You have to actually respect religion to enforce the neutrality.

Yes indeed, - if legislators support the Constitution they will insure the free exercise of religion. Urging them to write law based on the establishments of religion defeats that neutrality.

However should they be neutral to methods that work? (*e.g. faith based programs to free people from drug abuse etc.?)

Giving government money to religious organizations will only corrupt them, - bet on it. 194

200 posted on 04/17/2005 10:11:49 AM PDT by P_A_I
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson