Posted on 04/15/2005 6:31:16 AM PDT by bedolido
Thanks for the welcome. It was a serious question.
In my opinion there are some legitimate ethical issues related to medically unnecessary genital surgery on children.
Whether or not you deem circumcision to be medically necessary, I can assure you that a circumcision on an infant a few days old is much less traumatic than one performed a couple of years later when repeated infections in the foreskin make it "medically necessary".
It is not just my opinion that infant circumcision is medically unnecessary, it is the opinion of every professional medical organization in the world that has an official policy on circumcision. Professional medical organizations unanimously say there is no medical indication for neonatal circumcision.
Repeated infections are rare in children with intact genitals, both boys and girls. When a girl gets a genital infection, the doctor will treat it with medication, not surgery. Medication is also an effective treatment for infections in boys with intact genitals. Surgery should be the last resort, not the first recommendation, especially when there are effective non-invasive methods of treatment available.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.