Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fireforeffect

Excellent point, however, the survivability of the platform is an open question. Thos Cleveland hulls were not all that great. In fact, the Clevelands were a very bad design, being top heavy and prone to roll when firing all out, which affected accuracy.

I like your MLRS soultion, but I recall that experience with rocket-launching ships was very bad at Omaha Beach, Okinawa and Iwo Jima. Again, the stability issue loomos large. If someone could knock that problem, it might work. Personally, I'd rather see that solution applied to a brown-water vessel, capable of moving close inshore and up rivers.


82 posted on 04/15/2005 5:43:53 AM PDT by Wombat101 (Sanitized for YOUR protection....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: Wombat101
Yes. I did not say copy exactly. Its a concept.

The MLRS is a stand off weapon. No direct fire. Modern stabilization gear would solve the problem. There was a video back in the M1 was being fielded. It showed the view through the gunner's sight and from the top of the tank while driving cross country. The sight picture was rock steady and the external picture was like a roller coaster.
98 posted on 04/15/2005 6:08:35 AM PDT by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson