Sudan’s Islamist regime, once shunned by Washington for providing a haven for Osama bin Laden as well as for human rights abusers during decades of civil war, has become an ally in the Bush administration’s “war on terror”.
Only months after the then United States secretary of state, Colin Powell, accused Khartoum of genocide in Darfur, Sudan has become a crucial intelligence asset to the CIA.
In the Middle East and Africa, Sudan’s agents have penetrated networks that would not normally be accessible to the US, a former American intelligence official told The Guardian. Sudan is credited with detaining foreign militants on their way to join anti-American fighters in Iraq. Sudanese agents have also helped the CIA to monitor Islamist organisations in Somalia.
“The intelligence relationship is the strongest thread between Washington and Khartoum,” the official said. “Khartoum is probably the only government in the Arab League that has contributed in a major way to the protection of US forces and citizens in Iraq.’’
News of the growing cooperation was first reported in The Los Angeles Times. The newspaper traced the thaw in relations since 2001 to a milestone last week: the visit to Washington by Sudan’s intelligence chief, Salah Abdallah Gosh.
It reported that Sudan’s secret police had begun a crackdown on suspected Islamists, shared evidence with the FBI and allowed US personnel to interrogate al-Qaeda suspects.
In May 2003, Sudanese security forces raided a suspected terrorist training camp and deported more than a dozen, mainly Saudi, militants to Arab states that work closely with US intelligence services, the newspaper said.
Yet, a decade ago, Sudan was providing a haven to Bin Laden and other international outlaws, such as Carlos the Jackal. In 1993, the Clinton administration placed it on the State Department’s list of terrorist regimes.
Subsequent approaches from Khartoum were rebuffed — even as it offered its services against the emer-ging al-Qaeda network in the 1990s.
“Sudan tried to hand over two guys implicated in the 1998 bombing of the US embassies in East Africa, and the response was to send cruise missiles to hit the aspirin factory in Khartoum,” the official said. “They offered up Bin Laden in 1995 and we said, ‘We don’t even have an indictment on him.’”
Officially, Washington’s position towards Sudan remains unchanged. “Sudan is still considered a state sponsor of terror,” a State Department spokesperson said this week. And although the recent cooperation has yielded important results, it promises to be politically explosive.
The US Christian right and human rights organisations have been strong advocates of the Sudanese rebels and are unlikely to support any softening of Washington’s stance. —
http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=237631&area=/insight/insight__africa/
Report: Anti-Muslim bias soars in US
Wednesday 11 May 2005, 3:50 Makka Time, 0:50 GMT
Attacks on Muslims have been on the rise since 9/11
The number of reported bias crimes and civil rights violations against Muslims has risen sharply in the United States last year, says a report.
The Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations in its report blamed the trend on lingering animosity toward Muslims and a growing use of anti-Muslim rhetoric by some political, religious and media figures.
The council counted 1522 incidents in which Muslims reported their civil rights had been violated in 2004, a 49% increase over 2003. Another 141 incidents of confirmed or suspected bias crimes were committed against Muslims – a 52% rise.
Notable bias or discrimination cases cited in a council report to be published on Wednesday include the barring of singer Cat Stevans, now known as Yusuf Islam, and Islamic scholar Tariq Ramadan from entering the United States.
Unexpected findings
Some Muslim leaders were surprised by the report's findings.
Yaser El-Menshawy, chairman of New Jersey's council of mosques, said he and others thought the number of anti-Muslim incidents shortly after the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon reached a peak that would not be repeated.
"I thought we were through with the high point after 9/11," he said. "My gut feeling is it may be a combination of the war in Iraq and mounting casualties, and that we are getting better at collecting this kind of data."
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/3DDD0617-E649-410C-83F9-06F553A3A42F.htm
That article on the Sudan is very surprising.