To: nuconvert
We may have little choice. We can always try MEK for small projects and dump them if they become inhumane or a problem. We fought with communists Russians against Hitler, and we used communists French Resistance against him. Potentially, a nuclear Iran poses more problems. We need to get serious, we may need to realize that the best answer isn't a perfect answer. Thoughts?
16 posted on
04/14/2005 3:13:48 PM PDT by
elhombrelibre
(Hezbollah will disarm before we see Kerry sign his SF 180,)
To: elhombrelibre
The Iranians will not accept MEK. They are despised as much if not more than the regime.
17 posted on
04/14/2005 3:18:39 PM PDT by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
To: elhombrelibre
I'd rather Mullahs to MEK terrorists!
The only way to win the war on Mullahs is to support the Iranian people and their desire to be free.
MEK has no commitment to democracy and freedom of my country.
Support students and American loving people of Iran, but not MEK.
Thanks
22 posted on
04/14/2005 5:24:43 PM PDT by
Khashayar
(Take Carter! We'll Keep the Shah. <<< American protestors defending the Shah in NYC in 1979)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson