Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
But you never asked the question in that form.

False witness. Read #365 again. I asked you right away to explain your position.

390 posted on 05/04/2005 8:26:41 AM PDT by Thatcherite (Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies ]


To: Thatcherite; AndrewC
Actually not right away, overstating my case, but after you'd raised the bewildering McVeigh and "sons" vs "children" issues. Ages ago, anyway, not "never".
391 posted on 05/04/2005 8:33:24 AM PDT by Thatcherite (Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]

To: Thatcherite

I have a simple interpretation of difficult Bible verses. I think people at any given time do their best to understand existence and understand God. the understanding changes with time because cultures evolve, and people are able to see things were formerly hidden to them. This does not imply that our current understanding is perfect.

I think it requires an enormous ability to compartmentalize to think that the words of the Old testament represent the absolute and unchanging word of God. We can see the worldview of the Old Testament patriarchs alive and flourishing in the Middle East today.


392 posted on 05/04/2005 8:34:55 AM PDT by js1138 (e unum pluribus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson