Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Video: Launch of the USS Texas (SSN 775)
media.primezone.com ^ | 13-April-2005 | media.primezone.com

Posted on 04/13/2005 4:16:12 PM PDT by Textide

Found a link to this one on Subsim.com. The launch of SSN 775, nuclear attack submarine USS Texas, only the second Virginia class sub. She's a big one!

Video

Website


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: ssn775; submarine; usn; usstexas; virginiaclass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 04/13/2005 4:16:12 PM PDT by Textide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

Thought you might like this.


2 posted on 04/13/2005 4:17:05 PM PDT by Textide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Textide

I was on the 599 and the 703 boats. They still keep spitting them out, don't they?

The 599 was an archaic piece of work compared to this 775 boat.


3 posted on 04/13/2005 4:24:08 PM PDT by montomike (Gay means happy and carefree...not an abomination against nature's check valve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Sub PING


4 posted on 04/13/2005 4:32:14 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Have you said Thank You to a service man or woman today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Textide

From http://www.fact-index.com/u/us/uss_texas.html

USS Texas

Three ships of the United States Navy have borne (and a fourth will soon bear) the name USS Texas, in honor of Texas, a region that, after being taken from its natives by first Spain and then Mexico, and later becoming an independent republic, was admitted to the United States as the 28th state on December 29, 1845.

The first Texas was the United States Navy's first battleship, which served from 1895 until 1911.

The second Texas (BB-35) was a dreadnought battleship that served in both World Wars.

The third Texas (DLGN/CGN-39) was the second Virginia-class nuclear guided missile cruiser.

The fourth Texas (SSN-775) will be the second Virginia-class nuclear attack submarine when she joins the fleet in 2005.

See also CSS Texas.


5 posted on 04/13/2005 4:32:40 PM PDT by sonofatpatcher2 (Texas, Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

Sub PING


6 posted on 04/13/2005 4:34:55 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Have you said Thank You to a service man or woman today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montomike

She's state of the art. But I've been hearing things about reducing the run of the VA class. There's a lot of missed messages. One line runs that it is too small for unmanned subs to be added (a growing trend in the sub service), and then the other line is there are major improvements in the VA class where the engine/reactor would be reduced in volume by like 50%. The two themes actually have some commonality, so it'll be interesting how it plays out.


7 posted on 04/13/2005 4:35:26 PM PDT by ProudVet77 (It's boogitty boogitty boogitty season!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sonofatpatcher2

Thanks for posting that. I didn't know that there was a guided missile cruiser name Texas.


8 posted on 04/13/2005 4:40:17 PM PDT by Texas_Jarhead (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1366853/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ProudVet77

Another site: http://www.nn.northropgrumman.com/texas/


9 posted on 04/13/2005 4:43:07 PM PDT by sonofatpatcher2 (Texas, Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ProudVet77

sorry missed==mixed my Brooklyn accent took over my fingers ;)



10 posted on 04/13/2005 4:43:28 PM PDT by ProudVet77 (It's boogitty boogitty boogitty season!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Textide

The name Texas has a long history with ships. The Newport News shipyard built two of the previous U.S. Navy ships named Texas — the battleship USS Texas (BB 35) and the cruiser USS Texas (CGN 39).

Texas (Second Class Battleship)
The Norfolk Navy Yard launched the first Texas battleship on June 28, 1892 and it went on to take part in the war between the United States and Spain that erupted in 1898. Its name changed to San Marcos in 1911 to allow the name Texas to be assigned to the Newport News-built Battleship 35.

Texas (Battleship No. 35)
Newport News launched the battleship Texas May 18, 1912. This Newport News battleship was the second Texas. It went directly to operational duty without the usual shakedown cruise and post-shakedown repair period when it headed toward Mexican waters in 1914 to support American forces ashore. This ship went on to earn five battle stars during World War II. It embarked on its first major combat operation on October 23, 1942 as a part of an invasion of Northern Africa and in 1944 began training for the invasion of Normandy. The ship also later conducted invasion rehearsals and set a course for Iwo Jima. For three days, Texas pounded enemy defenses on Iwo Jima in preparation for the landings. The battleship was decommissioned April 21, 1948 and turned over to the state of Texas to serve as a permanent memorial.

Texas (CGN-39)
Texas (CGN-39) was the second Virginia-class nuclear guided missile cruiser. It was built by Newport News and launched on August 9, 1975. It was laid down as a guided missile frigate on August 18, 1973 at Newport News and reclassified as a guided missile cruiser and redesignated CGN 39 when the shipyard launched it. Texas saw combat for the first time when it responded to Libyan aggression in the Gulf of Sidra. The ship’s history also includes service during Desert Storm. In 1993, the ship was decommissioned.


11 posted on 04/13/2005 4:46:22 PM PDT by sonofatpatcher2 (Texas, Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead

Semper Fi...

BTW they pulled your http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1366853/ thread


12 posted on 04/13/2005 4:49:21 PM PDT by sonofatpatcher2 (Texas, Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sonofatpatcher2

I am aware of the pulled thread. My utilization of it in my tagline is a form of protest. The overseers' attitudes towards discussion of the MMP have improved markedly as of late so I can probably get rid of it now.


13 posted on 04/13/2005 4:56:37 PM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sonofatpatcher2

Thanks for the history!


14 posted on 04/13/2005 5:06:54 PM PDT by Textide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Textide

Re: "Thanks for the history!"

Alas, it only seems like yesterday to me...

BTW - Getting old sucks!


15 posted on 04/13/2005 5:19:22 PM PDT by sonofatpatcher2 (Texas, Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Textide

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1174718/posts

Some good post here about it as well :o)

Thanks for the the link of the video and website! :o)


16 posted on 04/13/2005 5:27:57 PM PDT by Txslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; judicial meanz; submarinerswife; PogySailor; chasio649; gobucks; ...

'Steely-eyed Killers of the Deep' PING


17 posted on 04/13/2005 5:44:11 PM PDT by IonImplantGuru (Give me heaven... or a 637!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: montomike

SSRN586 was an unusual boat and the longest ever when commissioned in 1959. Twin reactors and first submerged circumnavigation of the world.

spookie


18 posted on 04/13/2005 5:46:49 PM PDT by spookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ProudVet77
They are already working on something else.

Check out this: Tango Bravo

It is actually smaller than the Virginia class but at least as powerful.

This vision has a lot of pretty cool concepts.

They really need several classes of boats. They should keep building Virgina and have this newer class boat. Perhaps they should have more deep water boats along the lines of the Seawolf specs but with more modern technology. I still am not convinced that the modular hulling of the Virginia was worth the depth trade off. I think that this will become clear as our enemies develop better detection technoloy.

With all of the "fashionable" talk about "littoral missions," one should not forget that our sub force still has its traditional blue water role, and that role requires a mixture of strategic and conventional capabilities.

We need more subs, not less. We real need at least a 400 ship navy.

19 posted on 04/13/2005 5:50:18 PM PDT by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Textide

Man if you only new what these babies could do under water. Seeing, hearing, and hidding! I was on one back in 84. Just going around the hawaian Islands. Totally incredible!


20 posted on 04/13/2005 5:50:21 PM PDT by ibtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson