Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone

I think Steyn is wrong. Hillary is not electable

I hope you're right, but Herr Steyn is usually pretty spot on! What we need to do is start on a plan, not to mention finding a candidate, to BEAT HER.


23 posted on 04/13/2005 1:38:08 PM PDT by Primetimedonna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Primetimedonna
I think Steyn is wrong. Hillary is not electable

Hillary is not electable, but what's left of the RAT party is learning how to seize power while losing elections.

Kerry as an awful candidate, a dweeb at best. But the RAT media promised him an extra 15% of the vote, and they delivered. Books, movies, and all sorts of life support. They even figure they could have won if they could somehow steal 55,000 move votes in Ohio. They know how many states are in their bag, and what states/precincts they have to steal.

For Hitlery in 2008, they will gladly provide 20% of the vote. There will be more books, more movies, and more forged documents against Republicans. This may result in the destruction of the RAT party, but the Clintons won't need the party after that. They'll be supported by one-world billionaires like Soros, and an increasingly imperialist left-wing judiciary.

Hitlery's dream is "one woman, one vote, one time".

68 posted on 04/13/2005 4:19:02 PM PDT by 300winmag (FR's Hobbit Hole supports America's troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Primetimedonna; Cicero
Steyn is usually pretty spot on! What we need to do is start on a plan, not to mention finding a candidate, to BEAT HER.
If FR even exists . . . Hilary will try to shut us down. Perhaps we have to launch some lawsuits of our own against the FCC and the FEC to try to expose the hypocrisy at the heart of McCain-Feingold. Such as attributing value to tendentious News coverage.

If she fails to shut us down, the Internet will have 4 more years of market penetration than it had last year.

they will have to take some conservative southerner who is unknown to most of the country and make him known, with the liberal media obstructing every inch of the way.
. . . but we only have to do it in the red states, and marginal border states whether blue or red.

What we need, IMHO, is to start now doing 12-year, 10-year, and 8-year retrospectives on what was going on in the Clinton Administration back in 1993, 1995, and 1997. In '06, assuming she wins reelection to the Senate, we should really do our maximum effort to tar Hillary with the Clinton Administration's scandals and tar the Democratic Party by association, shaming the D Party to put up a presidential candidate who's better for president than Robert Torricelli was for reelection to the Senate from New Jersey.

We especially need to hammer that message in the purplish states like FL, OH, and MN. If it succeeds and she isn't nominated, IMHO it's money well spent. Even if the Repubicans wish they had the money back for the general election.


70 posted on 04/13/2005 4:23:24 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson