Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill O'Reilly touts Bishop Spong's new book (one claim in the book: St Paul was closeted gay)
amazon ^ | Ap 05 | Jack Spong

Posted on 04/12/2005 11:19:52 PM PDT by churchillbuff

O'Reilly has written a dustjacket blurb for Bishop Spong's new book: "The Sins of Scripture challenges Christians to look beyond the myths of their faith into the heart of the matter." I also got an email from a Spong-promoting outfit that says O'Reilly will have Spong on his show.

Here's the Publishers Weekly review on amazon:

Spong, a retired Episcopal bishop and prominent spokesperson for liberal Christianity, focuses this book on "terrible texts" which have been used to justify such "sins" as overbreeding, degradation of the environment, sexism, child abuse and anti-Semitism. These biblical texts, according to Spong, are not the incontrovertible Word of God, but flawed human responses to perceived threats. An incendiary example of this is Spong's assertion that Paul was a closeted gay man whose anti-gay statements were motivated by little more than his own self-loathing. Spong does not stop there; in the course of the book he suggests that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married; that none of the supernatural events described in the Bible took place (including the resurrection); and that theism itself is a misunderstanding of God. Interestingly, readers who do not endorse Spong's radical reinterpretation of Christianity will still find much in this book they can affirm. His explanation of the roots of Christian anti-Semitism is fascinating and much less challenging to orthodoxy than many of his other claims. Unfortunately, Spong leads with his weakest section, which features a variety of poorly constructed arguments claiming, but giving inadequate evidence for, a strong causal relationship between biblical injunctions and both overpopulation and environmental problems. Nonetheless, this absorbing book has much to offer readers of all persuasions.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: bishopspong; bookreview; endoftheage; homosexualagenda; oreilly; religiousleft; sinsofscripture; sodomite; spong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 381-387 next last
To: cyborg
If this is true then O'Reilly is a degenerate

BOR's behavior has made that obvious for some time now.

One time he had on two porn 'stars' and did not ask them one substantive question, which caused me to be puzzled as to why they were there. My puzzlement didn't last very long. I stopped watching him.

From the article:

An incendiary example of this is Spong's assertion that Paul was a closeted gay man whose anti-gay statements were motivated by little more than his own self-loathing.

SpongBob has a little projection going on there, not to mention that he loathes God, too.

Cordially,

101 posted on 04/13/2005 7:22:25 AM PDT by Diamond (Qui liberatio scelestus trucido inculpatus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
O'Reilly has...issues.
102 posted on 04/13/2005 7:27:34 AM PDT by conservonator (Blank by popular demand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead

Probably talking about that book of James comment.


103 posted on 04/13/2005 7:47:45 AM PDT by rudyudy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ahadams2; Peanut Gallery; tellw; nanetteclaret; Saint Reagan; Marauder; stan_sipple; SuzyQue; ...
Thanks to hellinahandcart for spotting and pinging this.

Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-7 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar and newheart.

Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com

Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15

104 posted on 04/13/2005 8:23:45 AM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Iran Azadi || Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

"in the course of the book he suggests that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married"

These Episco-Baalian queer nations bishops need to get their blasphemy straight. Queen Robinson says Jesus was gay because he would only hang with dudes. SpongBob claims Jesus was married with children ala Al Bundy. Or will the next communist bishop tell us Jesus was bi?


105 posted on 04/13/2005 8:31:03 AM PDT by stan_sipple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diamond

"An incendiary example of this is Spong's assertion that Paul was a closeted gay man whose anti-gay statements were motivated by little more than his own self-loathing"

Right I just remembered that only Liberal Democrats are allowed to use gay and race baiting pejoratives against vicitmists, cf Bill clinton "self loathing gay Republicans."


106 posted on 04/13/2005 8:33:25 AM PDT by stan_sipple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: durasell
"Actually he's [Spong] a well known Biblical scholar and devoutly religious from an early age, but he's getting on in years."

"Scholar"?? I'm afraid you're quite delusional.

The man is a blaspheming liar and perverter of the Bible -- IOW, he's a tool of Satan.

107 posted on 04/13/2005 8:35:04 AM PDT by Liberator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: durasell

"Actually he's a well known Biblical scholar and devoutly religious from an early age, but he's getting on in years."

Actually he is a heretic and is typical of what is wrong with the Episcopal Church.


108 posted on 04/13/2005 8:35:23 AM PDT by Busywhiskers (When in doubt--punch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

O'Reilly's pet name for him is 'Bishop Loofah.'


109 posted on 04/13/2005 8:39:36 AM PDT by Sloth (I don't post a lot of the threads you read; I make a lot of the threads you read better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberator

"Actually he's [Spong] a well known Biblical scholar and devoutly religious from an early age, but he's getting on in years."

I was forced to read this heretics biblical porno trash "why christianity must change or die." I have never read so many tendentious non sequitur arguments all packed into one book.

Even the Jesus seminar liberals should consider bishop SongBob an embarassment


110 posted on 04/13/2005 8:40:04 AM PDT by stan_sipple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; churchillbuff
O'Reilly made a deal with the devil when his lawsuit was settled. He's now playing for the wrong team. To assert that Paul was gay, Jesus was married, and (the real no-no) to deny the resurrection is satanic. He's damned.

overpopulation

LOL. When they trot out "too many people on the planet" to support their assertion of "the sins of Scripture," you know the book is written by a nazi.

The entire population of the planet could fit standing up in Jacksonville, Florida.

The agenda gets darker with every rancid book like this and every shrill voice that praises it. Wake up, America.

111 posted on 04/13/2005 8:41:25 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
If he is a well known biblical scholar, why did he come to the conclusion, cited above, that the Bible is, in effect, detrimental to humanity? Where do his moral teachings come from, and why should they be accepted by anyone?

Bingo! This is exactly the problem, IMHO, with any self-made religion. The person who picks and chooses what to believe in Scripture is claimign to be wiser than Jesus (or indeed, any religious leader whom he claims), whether he realizes it or not.

112 posted on 04/13/2005 8:46:15 AM PDT by Buggman (Baruch ata Adonai, Elohanu Mehlech ha Olam, asher nathan lanu et derech ha y’shua b’Mashiach Yeshua.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
An incendiary example of this is Spong's assertion that Paul was a closeted gay man whose anti-gay statements were motivated by little more than his own self-loathing.

This apostate has been claiming, since at least 1993 and his book Rescuing the Bible from Fundamentalism, that Paul was a closeted homosexual who persecuted Christians as a way of proving his masculinity to other Jews.

I wonder how long it is before Sponggggg! starts claiming (like Canadian Anglican arch-heretic Tom Harpur) that Jesus never existed.

There once was a bishop named Spong
Whose views were exceedingly strong.
"The literal meaning
Is crass and demeaning,"
He said, but was literally wrong.

113 posted on 04/13/2005 8:56:05 AM PDT by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: durasell
Actually he's a well known Biblical scholar and devoutly religious from an early age, but he's getting on in years.

In my view being a well known Biblical scholar and devoutly religious from an early age doesn't matter in light of heresy, blasphemy, and sacrilege. Are you saying that he talks this way because he suffers from dementia? That would be an entirely different matter.
114 posted on 04/13/2005 9:01:53 AM PDT by Jaysun (I must warn you, I am a black belt in bullshitsu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bogolyubski
He's actually an apostate - one who has turned away from and rejected Christ and his church. Blasphemy, bad as it is, is less serious. Andres Serrano's "Piss Christ" was blasphemous.

Claiming that Jesus Christ wasn't resurrected is blasphemous (to me).
115 posted on 04/13/2005 9:03:58 AM PDT by Jaysun (I must warn you, I am a black belt in bullshitsu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

OReily is a very smart calculating phoney.

He is infected with harvard liberalism that never was cured.

I noticed during the whole marriage debate in 2004 he was mimicking J.Kerry.

He is a comentator of convenience, he is a "conservative" only because that is where the ratings are. (and he is not even a conservative.)_ I find it no surprise that OReily pushes for homosexualizing the dead.


How many times must a lie be repeated in order to become the accepted truth?


116 posted on 04/13/2005 9:10:27 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

bump


117 posted on 04/13/2005 9:11:21 AM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: derllak
I'm so tired of so called "scholars" proclaiming that certain biblical figures and great men of history were gay!

Or members of this lodge or that lodge. OK, Washington was a Mason, but was/is Jesus a Mason? Is Gumby an Odd Fellow? We know Fred Flintstone is a Water Buffalo, Homer Simpson a Stonecutter and Bullwinkle a Moose. :-).

ff

118 posted on 04/13/2005 9:31:46 AM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

Thanks for the ping and the truth.


119 posted on 04/13/2005 10:02:33 AM PDT by international american (Tagline now flameproof....purchased from "Conspiracy Guy Custom Taglines"LLC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
Bishop Spong is a blasphemer.

Yep.

120 posted on 04/13/2005 10:04:05 AM PDT by Skooz (Host organism for the State parasite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 381-387 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson