"Non-believing scientists" don't refuse to consider anything. They will accept any and all evidence for creationism that appears.
Unfortunately for those here who feel some nostalgia for the Dark Ages, there is no evidence for a literal interpretation of the Bible (quoting the Bible itself doesn't count as evidence in the scientific community.)
If you want creationism to be accepted as science, all you have to do is show a scrap of evidence to support it. Or you can do what I do-- trust in Jesus for spiritual guidance, and trust scientists for empirical interpretations. There's nothing mutually exclusive about doing both.
"Non-believing scientists" don't refuse to consider anything.
Maybe scientists will consider anything but they will not allow the conflicting facts which show that the theory of evolution still has many wrinkles to iron out. This opens them up to charges of intellictual dishonesty by the creationists. It's no accident that most major leaps of science have been made by scientists who were somewhat on the fringes of the science community.