The article, contrary to CobaltBlue's mysterious post, doesn't say that Schiavo was an owner of Liberty American Insurance Group.
You seem to be trying to head off a conclusion before it is even suggested. Why? What's in it for you?
The article is pretty much incoherent--but I guess there's enough names and data to check for associations.
I realize that any who try and get to the truth in the Schiavo case is subject to relentless attack but perhaps you can tell me why this article points to the creation of a company in the Schiavo's home which it claims owns the insurance company. Now why would it IMPLY that Sciavo owns the company? And why wouldn't one want to know this?
How does wanting to know this make it a matter of my personal interest? Do you believe I have no disinterested concern in such matters? How much will you pay me to ask embarassing questions.