Skip to comments.
Catholics in U.S. Keep Faith, but Live With Contradictions
NY Times ^
| April 11, 2005
| DEAN E. MURPHY and NEELA BANERJEE
Posted on 04/10/2005 8:45:39 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 last
To: Knitting A Conundrum
I suspect it's more your 24 hours. You receive Eucharist at 8 in the morning, then again 12 hours later, then you better wait a full 12 hours your personal time before receiving again, no matter how many time zones you cross! Or that's how I would feel obliged to interpret it for my personal doings. One is permitted to receive the Eucharist at, say, a Saturday morning Mass, then receive again at the anticipated Sunday Mass on Saturday evening.
Or, one is permitted to receive at the Saturday Vigil Mass, then receive again on Sunday.
One may receive at different Masses on the same day or the same Mass (such as the Sunday Mass) on different days.
One may also, for instance, receive the Eucharist at a daily Mass, then receive again at a wedding Mass the same day.
61
posted on
04/11/2005 8:23:18 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
To: sinkspur
Your diocese must be in perfect shape if the bishop is focusing on minutiae like this. Well, it was only one thing in the revision of Liturgical Norms. But it was in bold. And made me very happy. Can't wait 'til he moves on to clapping in church and heretical deacons!
Your abortion-loving hero Rudy popularized broken window theory -- take care of the little things and the greater things will build from there.
62
posted on
04/11/2005 8:28:06 PM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
(“When you’re hungry, you eat; when you’re a frog, you leap; if you’re scared, get a dog.”)
To: JohnnyZ
Can't wait 'til he moves on to clapping in churchDid you hear all the clapping at the Papal funeral? Should that be banned too?
(Clapping is nowhere in the new liturgical norms. Holding hands at the Our Father is also optional.)
63
posted on
04/11/2005 8:30:57 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
To: Knitting A Conundrum
I suspect it's more your 24 hours. You receive Eucharist at 8 in the morning, then again 12 hours later, then you better wait a full 12 hours your personal time before receiving again, no matter how many time zones you cross! Or that's how I would feel obliged to interpret it for my personal doings. So Catholics on the ISS can't have an hourly communion mass? >:*3
64
posted on
04/11/2005 8:41:11 PM PDT
by
supercat
("Though her life has been sold for corrupt men's gold, she refuses to give up the ghost.")
To: latina4dubya
many, like the young woman in this article, are making a mockery of CatholicismHardly. The LA Times is mocking Catholicism! It's no big trick to to find a bad example. Don't get your eye off the ball - a dangerous part of the liberal agenda is to marginalize Christianity.
65
posted on
04/11/2005 8:58:13 PM PDT
by
delacoert
(imperat animus corpori, et paretur statim: imperat animus sibi, et resistitur. -AUGUSTINI)
To: delacoert
Oops. LA NY Times
66
posted on
04/11/2005 8:59:48 PM PDT
by
delacoert
(imperat animus corpori, et paretur statim: imperat animus sibi, et resistitur. -AUGUSTINI)
To: neverdem
She attends Mass every Sunday but has had two children out of wedlock. She thinks abortion is murder but chafes at the Vatican's ban on birth control.What's she worried about the ban on birth control for? She obviously isn't using any or she wouldn't have two kids out of wedlock.
To: narses
Here is why we avoid so called 'catholic' schools, in the words of a 'catholic school' student: Ugh. That's why we're homeschooling, and when the time for college comes, we'll only consider financing tuition for a mandatum college.
68
posted on
04/12/2005 4:44:07 AM PDT
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: neverdem
Doesn't sound like they're keeping the faith to me. Around here we call'em cafeteria Catholics. And most of the Catholics we know fit that description.
69
posted on
04/12/2005 4:48:06 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: neverdem
The NYT generally interviews a lot of different folks with lots of different points of views, and then only uses the interviews that prove their point. They do the same thing with polls, only citing the ones that support their uber-liberal talking points.
If they ever call, do yourself a favor and hang-up on them.
70
posted on
04/12/2005 4:48:47 AM PDT
by
tdewey10
(Rest in Peace Pope John Paul II)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson