[FreeReign]

No, I don't have a problem with showing passport proof upon re-entry....demanding extra proof from citizens who seek to re-enter the US LEGALLY.

Saying you have no problem with passport proof and then complaining about demands of extra proof from citizens?

You contradict yourself, or more like you outed yourself. Either way, you're stoopid.

[TapTheSource]

I see I touched a nerve, but given your lack of moral clarity, you're probably not sure about what's bothering you. Let me give you a hypothetical. Let's say terrorists set off a series of large conventional bombs or a small nuclear device in a densely populated area of the US. And let's say someone like Bill Gertz writes and article about it proving that the terrorists entered the US through our vast unsecured boarder with the assistance of Mexican Coyotes. His concluding remark could very well read something like this:

"The final IRONY is that when the US finally decided to act, rather than face the real problem, it chose to beef up passport requirements at its tiny boarder checkpoints. Due to political pressure from various special interests, our porous 2,000 mile boarder with Mexico was deliberately and continuously ignored until it was too late. Now we have suffered untold numbers of casualties, tens of thousands of lives have been needlessly incinerated, and one of our fair cities lies in ruins." Does the irony begin to emerge, or are you still in the dark, FreeReign?