Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Will Tighten Passport Rules (for citizens while advocating amnesty for illegals)
Washington Post ^ | April 6, 2005 | John Mintz

Posted on 04/10/2005 11:43:00 AM PDT by TapTheSource

Edited on 04/10/2005 11:46:47 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

Millions of Americans will be required to show passports when they reenter the United States from Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean by 2008 under new rules announced yesterday by the State and Homeland Security departments.

The new policy, designed to thwart terrorists from exploiting the relative ease of travel in North America, means that Americans who lack U.S. passports will have to obtain them to travel between the United States and neighboring nations. It also will require Mexicans and Canadians to present either passports or another official document to enter this country, with details to be determined.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boarderpatrol; bordersecurity; homelandsecurity; illegalimmigration; mexico; passports; unitedstates; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: TapTheSource
No, I don't have a problem with showing passport proof upon re-entry. I'm just drawing attention to the fact that our current leadership is perfectly content with letting millions of illegals poor through our unprotected boarders while at the same time demanding extra proof from citizens who seek to re-enter the US LEGALLY. Is this IRONY completely lost on my fellow FReepers?

No, the irony is not lost on me. I especially dislike the current open borders policy that lets hundreds of thousands if not millions of diseased illegal aliens enter our country with no medical checks whatsoever. Does our esteemed president and congress want the US to suffer pandemic diseases? Where is the sanity in our so-called immigration policies?

21 posted on 04/10/2005 1:24:32 PM PDT by shebacal (Go, Minutemen, Go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
The President has never advocated "amnesty" and you know it but the lie has to stay alive in order to give the anti-immigration crowd something to whine about.

Anti-immigration crowd? You sound a bit confused. Amnesty isn't given to immigrants. Amnesty is given to illegal aliens. So those who are opposed to amnesty are anti-illegal immigration.

22 posted on 04/10/2005 1:26:08 PM PDT by judgeandjury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS; shebacal; John Lenin; GSlob

==Response: "In declining States the leadership intuitively choses the most harmful course of action."-A Great Historian 1888

I would only add the following statement from Malcom Muggeridge:

"A ruling class which is on the run, as ours is, is capable of every fatuity. It makes the wrong decisions, chooses the wrong people, and is unable to recognise its enemies--if it does not actually prefer them to its friends."

Malcum Muggeridge, 'Tread Softly for You Tread on My Jokes'


23 posted on 04/10/2005 1:28:29 PM PDT by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Then a few more sport stars each throw in a couple of million of their own money while asking all "True Americans" to send just one hours wages to the FENCE FUND?

This is a great idea. I will donate to a Fence Fund and happy to do it.

24 posted on 04/10/2005 1:29:45 PM PDT by shebacal (Go, Minutemen, Go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: judgeandjury

==Anti-immigration crowd? You sound a bit confused. Amnesty isn't given to immigrants. Amnesty is given to illegal aliens. So those who are opposed to amnesty are anti-illegal immigration.

Nicely put!


25 posted on 04/10/2005 1:29:56 PM PDT by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource
" It also will require Mexicans and Canadians to present either passports or another official document...."
26 posted on 04/10/2005 1:32:26 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

==The fear is overblown. Who's going to pay your SS benefits ? The 45 million aborted?

Are you kidding me??? BTW, I for one am not counting on SS benefits. As far as I'm concerned, they will be long gone when it is my time to retire. I am investing and saving for my retirement accordingly.


27 posted on 04/10/2005 1:35:27 PM PDT by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: traumer
In this particular case, a picture truly is worth a thousand words! Thanks for the thought-provoking imagery!!!
28 posted on 04/10/2005 1:37:29 PM PDT by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
The President has never advocated "amnesty" and you know it but the lie has to stay alive in order to give the anti-immigration crowd something to whine about.

You sound like the kind of person who would buy a $10 rolex. "The president say's its not amnesty so therefore it must not be so"

29 posted on 04/10/2005 1:38:31 PM PDT by rmmcdaniell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource
People rarely reflect on the fact that most revolutions are raised by very few relative to the afflicted nations total population. For example, The American Revolution had about 150,000 active participants out of a population of about 4,000,000; The French Revolution had about 225,000 active participants out of a total population of about 35,000,000; The Russian Revolution of 1917 was accomplished with about 250,000 out of a total population of 100,000,000.

Just before the attack on Pearl Harbor there was tremendous fear of an uprising among the Japanese living on Hawaii. The FBI head named Shriver(if I remember his name correctly was asked about the possibility, he stated in effect-if it happens about 5% will actively participate, about 5% will actively help resist, the remainder will sit on the fence and wait to see what happens. The general rule is up to about 5% of the population will revolt. If the aforementioned rule applies then about 5% of the Mexicans living here will rise up to take back the American Southwest. I have already been told by one Mexican lawyerette " We are taking over here!"

30 posted on 04/10/2005 1:50:16 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS; John Lenin; traumer; All

You are absolutely correct A. Paulus. And here is how such a tiny minority of Communists often succeed in overthrowing the targeted government:

(Taken from "We Are The Next Target", link below)

Wars of national liberation

Because open warfare against target governments would simply lead to defeat, the Communists always disguise their revolutions as civil wars. They camouflage their intentions by pretending to fight for the liberation of one class of people from another, using a divide-and-conquer technique against a nation's social structure. This method is referred to as a "war of national liberation," and it adapts its tactics to the unique circumstances of each country. Such a war can pit industrial workers against capitalists, as in Russia, Catholics against Protestants, as in Northern Ireland, blacks against whites, as in South Africa--or Arabs against Jews, as in Israel. The Communists do not openly identify themselves, acting instead as representatives of the supposedly "oppressed" class of people.

By painting their revolution as a spontaneous uprising of "oppressed masses," the Communists hope to convince the target population that it faces an unwinnable war rooted in fundamental social tensions. If the government is also paralyzed and cannot stop the terrorism, public morale quickly drops and the weakening government loses popular support. Believing that the revolution must eventually win, the population abandons active opposition to the terrorists and instead sues for peace at any cost. The perception ultimately becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy as the government collapses altogether.

Any "war of national liberation" can be divided into seven steps:

Step 1) To establish themselves in the minds of the target population as a force to be reckoned with, the revolutionaries must first force a heavy-handed reaction by the government. Their tactics are based on a 1969 book by Brazilian Communist Carlos Marighella, the Mini-Manual for Urban Guerrillas, which has been translated and distributed to terrorists throughout the world. Marighella explained how to use such frightening violence that "the government has no alternative except to intensify repression. The police roundups, house searches, arrests of innocent people, make life in the city unbearable... The political situation is transformed into a military situation, in which the militarists appear more and more responsible for errors and violence... The urban guerrilla must become more aggressive and violent, resorting without letup to sabotage, terrorism, expropriations, assaults, kidnappings and executions, heightening the disastrous situation in which the government must act."[55]

Step 2) Having provoked a harsh reaction by the target government, the Communists now flood the Western news media with stories of government atrocities, real or fabricated. The goal is to begin isolating the government from Western, primarily American, support. The revolutionaries label convicted terrorists as "political prisoners"; they invent elaborate stories of secret prisons and "death squads"; and they hide among civilians during fighting, causing the government to kill innocent people accidentally. Such heads of state as Chiang Kai-shek of China, Anastasio Somoza of Nicaragua, and the Shah of Iran have been portrayed as corrupt and repressive. The South African government has been painted as being violently racist, while the French colonial administration in Algeria and the British rule in Northern Ireland have been labeled as undemocratic. Similar publicity attacks have been used against South Korea, Vietnam, the Philippines, Rhodesia, El Salvador, Argentina, and dozens of other nations. The news media has always cooperated in these smear campaigns, never allowing the target regime a fair chance to respond to the charges.

Step 3) The Communists can now count on the U.S. State Department to pressure the target government to begin giving in to the revolutionaries, supposedly for the sake of "human rights." The regime offers compromises, including political reforms, the release of captured terrorists, and military cease-fires, which allow the terrorists to regroup and seize territory. But the revolutionaries also increase their demands, taking advantage of the government's weakened image.

Step 4) As the government loses prestige, the Communists escalate the revolutionary violence and general unrest. They organize mass demonstrations, which agitators turn into riots. Labor unions go on strike, building toward a general labor strike that cripples the entire economy. Marxist professors in the universities indoctrinate and recruit naive youth, who join the growing ranks of Communists and terrorists. And some Communist agents even infiltrate local religious organizations, masquerading as priests or other clergy so as to neutralize opposition and recruit more people into the revolution. This can be seen, for example, in the Liberation Theology movement in the Catholic and Protestant churches, which teaches that Jesus was a Marxist revolutionary. Liberation Theology is active today in many parts of Latin America, Africa, and the far East.

Step 5) Since the Communists are only a tiny minority of the population, they must create the illusion of popular support. By waging terrorist warfare against the very people they claim to be liberating, the revolutionaries can frighten the people into passive or even active support of the revolution. In China and Nicaragua, the Communists murdered peasant farmers in rural villages; in Algeria, they maimed and killed Arab muslims; in Northern Ireland, they have killed thousands of Catholics while "kneecapping" thousands more with guns and electric drills;[56] in South Africa, they have burned to death many hundreds of blacks with "necklaces"--tires soaked in gasoline, placed around the victim's neck, and lit on fire.[57] The revolutionaries accuse the victims of "collaborating" with the government, sending a powerful message to the rest of the population not to resist.

Step 6) Now the Communists are ready to enter the final phase of their revolution. With the target government steadily losing control over the country, the revolutionaries step up general terrorist violence while simultaneously negotiating for a new government. To accomplish this, the Communists often must split their revolutionary movement into two wings: an extremely violent faction pretending to oppose any peace agreement, and a more political faction that projects an image of pragmatism. The two factions secretly coordinate their activities, carrying out a "good cop/bad cop" scenario. Frightened by the escalating terrorism of the revolutionaries, the government makes concessions to the seemingly moderate faction, hoping to discourage the forces of violence. As the Communists tighten the vise, the government bargains away its remaining strength.

Step 7) Finally, in the name of democracy and "human rights," the U.S. State Department withdraws its support from the embattled regime, using diplomatic pressure to force out the old government entirely and replace it with another. The Communists have by this time maneuvered themselves into position to join the new coalition government. Because this new regime is weak and divided, the Communists quickly move to consolidate total power for themselves. Their naive liberal allies are executed, followed by systematic mass terror against the whole population. A Communist regime has been imposed.

These seven steps describe the pattern of a war of national liberation. This strategy has been used, with slight variations, against almost every nation now under Communism, and is well under way for many remaining non-Communist nations.[58] As we have seen, terrorism is a cornerstone of this strategy.

Full Article:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1220747/posts


31 posted on 04/10/2005 2:02:48 PM PDT by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource
It will be left to us to clean up this mess.
32 posted on 04/10/2005 2:06:27 PM PDT by Fast1 (Destroy America buy Chinese goods,Shop at Wal-Mart 3/18/05 American was gone when I woke up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

Settle down, we are not even close yet. The anti-christ hasn't taken power yet.


33 posted on 04/10/2005 2:06:41 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

Isn't this swell.


34 posted on 04/10/2005 2:08:06 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
==Settle down, we are not even close yet.

We are closer than you think, and I for one refuse to sit around while our enemies make inroads no matter how far off major conflagrations might be--TTS
35 posted on 04/10/2005 2:09:58 PM PDT by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

It's all part of the plan, patience.


36 posted on 04/10/2005 2:11:24 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

If you want to continue in english - press 1....


37 posted on 04/10/2005 2:13:19 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

And what plan would that be?


38 posted on 04/10/2005 2:18:59 PM PDT by mthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

==It's all part of the plan, patience.

That is the essence of Communist long-range strategy...PATIENT GRADUALISM.


39 posted on 04/10/2005 2:19:17 PM PDT by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

"rise up to take back the American Southwest"

This slogan is repeated often but it is only rhetoric, since The only thing that they can take back from what they had is land, empty land....because that is all they had before the west was colonized.

If it were just about the land, they would be homesteading out the desert where vasts areas of empty land now lies, but somehow they seem to be more interested in settle into areas where the US have built civil works and cities, which from anybody history book were not around during the times when the west was uncultivated.


40 posted on 04/10/2005 2:20:08 PM PDT by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson