Replies

If the vaccine has no side effects then I would be first in line to have my daughter protected. I can't imagine anyone taking the chance of their child getting cervical cancer when there is a way to avoid it.

I totally agree. While there are the sexual connotations with the disease, giving children a vaccination isn't the same thing as offering permission for sex. Cervical issues are disastrous in their far reaching effect from infertility to death.

If the vaccine has no side effects then I would be first in line to have my daughter protected. I can't imagine anyone taking the chance of their child getting cervical cancer when there is a way to avoid it.

I am with you on that one, I have HPV. I never knew I had it since I got it years before anyone even really knew. I never knew till it became cancer. I would gladly pay even $500 a shot if I knew my daughter would be protected. There is "NO" test for men so she could stay a virgin till marriage and still have it. If she married a man who's mother gave birth to him vaginally and she had any Lesions or Dysplasia she could pass it onto him. So even the man being a virgin is no guarantee. This is a sore subject amoung doctors on hows its spread and how you get it. Hell you don't even have to have sex, If you bump uglies fooling around in High School. GUESS WHAT, you can get it. Its an ugly thing and if I can protect my kids THEN BRING IT ON!!!!! I never want my kids to go through the surgeries and treatments I have had to go through. I just wanna know when it will be on the market so I can get in line LOL.