Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dimensio

"You're playing semantic games here. You're trying to distort Darwin's original comment beyond any semblance of its original context and then using that dishonest distortion as "proof" that Darwin included a Creator as part of the theory of evolution"

Actually, I was using it to show the ludicrousness of the statement I was replying to. (By that logic:)

Thanks for playing though.


409 posted on 04/12/2005 4:40:48 AM PDT by MacDorcha ("Do you want the e-mail copy or the fax?" "Just the fax, ma'am.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies ]


To: MacDorcha
Actually, I was using it to show the ludicrousness of the statement I was replying to. (By that logic:)

And your attempt was founded in a completely invalid analogy, because you were flat-out wrong about what Darwin said regarding the theory of evolution.

My point stands: a scientific theory cannot include within it any supernatural claims.
466 posted on 04/12/2005 8:01:35 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson