To: Dimensio
I said it before to others:
I can explain it to you, I can't understand it for you.
If you involve a creator any step, it is implied that the creator AT LEAST set up the mechanisms involved in evolution.
This means that evolution according to Darwin has been influenced by a Creator. This also means that (according to the original post we are focussing on) it is not scientific, because a supreme being is implied as a source of the theory.
295 posted on
04/11/2005 4:29:35 PM PDT by
MacDorcha
("Do you want the e-mail copy or the fax?" "Just the fax, ma'am.")
To: MacDorcha
I can explain it to you, I can't understand it for you.
No, you're not explaining it. You're throwing a quote from Darwin that was addressing a process that is not a part of the theory of evolution and dishonestly insisting that it creates an implication for the theory of evolution.
If you involve a creator any step, it is implied that the creator AT LEAST set up the mechanisms involved in evolution.
And at what "step" of the theory of evolution did Darwin involve a creator?
296 posted on
04/11/2005 4:35:02 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson