Replies

Ignorance, no matter how militant, is not science and makes lousy classroom subject matter.

The following are not arguments against a theory, nor are they a competing theory:

1. Ignorance of the existing theory.
2. Failure to understand the existing theory.
3. Astonishment at the existing theory.
4. Dislike of the existing theory.
5. Denial of verifiable facts.
6. Pointing to something not yet known.
7. Asserting something that isn't falsifiable.

Give us a contradiction of the existing theory. Or give us a theory of your own, which explains things better than the existing theory.

252 posted on 04/11/2005 12:32:25 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)

To: PatrickHenry

"Or give us a theory of your own, which explains things better than the existing theory."

ID would account for the presence of freewill. Evolution does not.

253 posted on 04/11/2005 12:36:48 PM PDT by MacDorcha ("Do you want the e-mail copy or the fax?" "Just the fax, ma'am.")

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794