I did not know that you were talking only about the fed. statute. They both have the same problem, though. They both apply only to Schiavo. That was the reason they declared the first law unconstitutional. After they had such great success with the first one, they decided to try it again. It just shows what I said to begin with--they knew it would be thrown out. The conservatives just got whatever they could get passed. The liberals made sure it would be unconstitutional.
"It just shows what I said to begin with--they knew it would be thrown out."
PLEASE SHOW EVIDENCE TO ME THAT THE NEW LAW WAS - (as you say) THROWN OUT! That means show me proof that the USSC specifically took this law as a case and declared it UN-Constitutional.
IT WASN'T - IT WAS JUST THAT THE 11th CIRCUIT COURT (and all the other fed courts) REFUSED TO OBEY IT - AND .. JUST BECAUSE THEY REFUSED TO OBEY IT DOESN'T MEAN IT WAS UN-CONSTITUTIONAL OR WAS THROWN OUT.