[CyberAnt]

Okay - you proved your point.

BUT .. I will never agree with you that they intentionally wrote it to be UN-Constitutional. That I don't believe at all.

And .. I don't believe it was UN-Constitutional - it was just another example of how the Men in Black have chosen to punish the people - by nullifying everything they do - unless of course they are democrats and then it's a free ride.

[Pepper777]

Brillant didn't prove the point at all. She pointed you towards The Florida Supreme Court ruling on the October 2003 Terri's Law.

[Brilliant]

I agree that the men in black are abusing their power. I'm not sure I agree that it wasn't unconstitutional. It should never have gotten to the point, though, where the legislature had to pass the law to begin with. The abuse of power came at the hands of Judge Greer, who found the facts he wanted to find, in order to issue the order he wanted to issue.

So if you think they did not intentionally write it to be unconstitutional, then why did they write it this way? I remember seeing interviews of legislators on TV before the court ruled on the issue, and the legislators themselves were saying it was unconstitutional and was certain to be declared so by the court. I remember the conservatives saying that they would have liked to get a better bill, but this is the only thing they could get passed, and they were hoping it would work.

The liberals are not stupid. They made sure it would be declared unconstitutional. They did not want to be blamed for blocking legislation, and they figured that the GOP would look foolish if it passed an unconstitutional bill. They jumped at the opportunity to make them look like fools.