Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: malakhi

RE: "I wouldn't say that it was "made up" afterward, but rather that it evolved over time by a process of theological reflection. You can see the difference in Christology even reading Mark vs. John. "

From an article i recently found:
"
The codex was written by three scribes, and the use of computer images that reveal details invisible to the naked eye may well make it possible to determine who made the corrections. Some are contemporary with the original manuscript, while others are later. The texts will be examined in depth. For instance, in Codex Sinaiticus the Gospel of St Mark ends at chapter 16, verse 8, with the discovery that Christ’s tomb was empty, although later Bibles have another 12 verses on the Resurrection. The study may well transform our understanding of the development of early Biblical texts. "

ping to: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1384289/posts


357 posted on 04/15/2005 8:52:21 AM PDT by 1 spark (Jeremiah 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies ]


To: 1 spark

That is correct. The earliest versions of Mark do not have the last 12 verses containing a post-resurrection appearance of Jesus.


358 posted on 04/15/2005 8:55:33 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson