[nicmarlo]

And I can, as well, demonstrate your error in judgment by repeatedly stating "compromise" when I said "backroom deals." Had I meant, "compromise" I would say such, as there is a difference. I repeat, again, I in fact know it is backroom deals between one Rat, one pubbie, and the Governor, NOT compromise. Now, go play your little head games with someone else that you can try to twist nonfacts into your version of truth.

[FreeReign]

And I can, as well, demonstrate your error in judgment by repeatedly stating "compromise" when I said "backroom deals." Had I meant, "compromise" I would say such, as there is a difference. I repeat, again, I in fact know it is backroom deals between one Rat, one pubbie, and the Governor, NOT compromise.

I know that you said "back-room deals". I called it compromise. Do you understand why? If I thought it was a back-room deal (with the nefarious implications that it implies) I also would have called it such. But I didn't. Get it?

Now, go play your little head games with someone else that you can try to twist nonfacts into your version of truth.

I disagree with you. Without insult I then tell you why I disagree with you. You then start making false accusations based on nothing that I said. So then I defend against those false accusations by demonstrating that your judgement was wrong. The more I do this the more insulted you got. Now you accuse we of playing a game.

You're posts are twisted.