Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Lucky for Berger that Terri Schiavo and John Paul II covered up this cover-up.
1 posted on 04/09/2005 9:43:38 AM PDT by Dr.Syn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Dr.Syn

This was timed to be buried by other stories.


2 posted on 04/09/2005 9:45:08 AM PDT by thoughtomator ("The Passion of the Opus" - 2 hours of a FReeper being crucified on his own self-pitying thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr.Syn
What ticks me off the most is; 1) the length of his Security Clearance suspension, three years, the same amount of time Dubya has left in office and 2) the suspension itself and that it wasn't a permanent revocation.

As such, there's nothing stopping the Sand Burglar from once again getting his fact little sticky fingers on Top Secret documents when a RAT once again sits in the WH - which is inevitable.

For all 'we the sheeple' know his SC might automatically be restored after his "suspension time" is up, or a short letter from his attorney requesting that it be reinstated might be all that's required. This sucks - BIG TIME.

3 posted on 04/09/2005 9:58:05 AM PDT by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr.Syn

"Berger AGREED to pay a $10,000 fine and give up his top-level security clearance for three years."

Agreed? Since when does a criminal have a say in his punishment?


4 posted on 04/09/2005 10:09:39 AM PDT by Arpege92 ("I am happy, be it yourselves." - Pope John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr.Syn

How I laughed so heartily at Berger taking the scissors and "accidentally" cut two of the 5 documents into little pieces. Woohoo! Personally, I'd like to see Sandy Berger go the way of Buddy the dog.


5 posted on 04/09/2005 10:11:24 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr.Syn

bump for later


8 posted on 04/09/2005 10:15:15 AM PDT by Burlem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr.Syn
I had a top secret + burn before reading clearance, I'd still be in jail if I accidentally removed secret material, I retired 25 years ago.
10 posted on 04/09/2005 10:18:17 AM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr.Syn

It's disgusting. Several of Nixon's top people were disgraced by the media, put in time in jail, and had their careers wrecked after committing much smaller offenses.

Nixon was villainized for thinking about misappropriating one FBI file, while hillary was excused for stealing 900 FBI files--which was only the tip of the iceberg.

So it's not just the little guys vs. the big guys. It's also the leftist factor. If you're a leftist, you can do just about anything and get away with it. If a leftist sets off a terrorist bomb or robs a bank they let her go after a few years to take on a cushy professorship, whereas if a "conservative" does it it's jail for life or a quick death sentence.


12 posted on 04/09/2005 10:22:55 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr.Syn

I find the timing of this suspicious.
But of course it's still Bush's fault.
It could have been hugh and series but the
timing reduced it to cheese. Chalk up another
one for those crafty democrats. Documents taken in the Watergate break-in weren't even classified. That
brought down a Presidency. Sandy Burglar
stole and destroyed classified top-secret documents
relating to the Clinton crime family and gets a fine.
Go figure.


14 posted on 04/09/2005 10:26:26 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Let the Constitution do the talkin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr.Syn

About 10+ years ago The American Spectator ran an expose on Berger revealing how he had manipulated his draft board status to avoid serving. Perhaps someone out there could find a copy.


15 posted on 04/09/2005 10:38:10 AM PDT by Shisan (When in doubt, win the trick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr.Syn

Bill Clinton's national security advisor (predecessor to Condoleezza Rice) has pled GUILTY to stealing classified documents and destroying some of them.

Notwithstanding his initial claims the incident in which he secreted documents in his pants and socks was an "honest mistake," Sandy Berger copped a plea and got a dainty slap on the wrist.

Berger's theft and lying were neither honest NOR a mistake. He willfully, with malice of forethought, and full knowledge of the severity of his crime, stole classified documents and destroyed some of them. The act is outflippingragous. The arrogance of Berger in presuming he could (and did) get away with it is way beyond aggravating. The sentence is infuriatingly absurd.

Once upon a time men where executed for less egregious offenses. Berger was sentenced to:
•No prison time.
•A measly $10,000 fine (less than one speaking fee).
•Three-year revocation of his security clearance.

This travesty of justice is sufficient to gag any maggot.

read the rest of the story:
http://www.geoffmetcalf.com
scroll almst to the bottom, the title is "Outrage"
he also has posted something from WSJ defending Berger.


16 posted on 04/09/2005 10:43:13 AM PDT by Burlem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr.Syn

It's fairly obvious that Berger would betray his country in a heartbeat if he thought there was anything in it for him. Why he should ever again be placed in a position of trust is beyond me. I wouldn't trust him with a change dispenser on an ice-cream truck.


17 posted on 04/09/2005 10:44:51 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr.Syn
Now, focus on what Berger actually achieved in return for the patty cake on the hand. Berger destroyed clear evidence that Willie received cash from the Iraqi oil voucher bribes and that Willie had significant connections with representatives of OBL and Saddam long before 9/11.

Other Clintonistas are at work destroying other evidence so that in 2008, Hillie's surrogates will be able to lie that Hillie's fights for America just as her husband did. It will be just like Whitewater; every one knows they did the crimes, it is just that all the witnesses are dead and all the evidence destroyed.

Sometimes, I wonder if W IS really as stupid as the dems say.

18 posted on 04/09/2005 10:50:24 AM PDT by Tacis ( SEAL THE FRIGGEN BORDER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr.Syn
From: http://www.usdoj.gov/contact-us.html

E-mails to the Department of Justice, including the Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, may be sent to:

AskDOJ@usdoj.gov.

20 posted on 04/09/2005 1:40:10 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson