"Do you really think 1/2 of those babies were seriously ill or deformed? I don't.
50% is a pretty high rate of babies who could not live."
My reading of it was that 50% of the babies who died, were euthanized. I'd have to see a comparison of infant mortality between the Netherlands and America to know how many extras were put down..
As compared to merely ending the lives of some babies early.. who would never have made it anyway.
I will bet that if you looked at those cases, you will find excessive deaths.
Once man justifies killing one, he goes on to then justify killing more and more. Why I don't know, but look at history.
The "save them from suffering needlessly" is purely a sales tactic to get the public to agree for physicians to have the power of determining when to kill. Sad that there are some who might be suffering - but - it shows how evil the proponents are when they use these innocents as justification to gain the power to kill.
We can not let them have that power.
We have to wake up and realize that there is much evil in this world and it is overtaking more and more men to do its work. What do we do - ignore it and let them kill?
I am sorry, did you really just use the term, "Put Down"..for babies?
Wow~ if that is the case, I guess I am pretty shocked. I have only every heard that term in association with animals. NOT HUMAN BABIES~
I work with severly/profoundly retarded children. It sounds to me that if they lived over there, they too, would have been "Put Down". After all, their quality of life must be so poor, that it would have been better off if they were dead.
Thankfully for me, they were not. And as such, my quality of life has been greatly improved.