Posted on 04/08/2005 1:50:03 PM PDT by CHARLITE
Someone who wants the right to stay out of his bedroom, and the left to stay out of his wallet.
There's only two things in the middle of the road. Roadkill and a yellow stripe.
"Moderates" tend to be gun grabbers as well.
Right, because conservatives never do anything to fuel these stereotypes...
A "moderate" is someone who can't take his own side in a quarrel.
Some are, some aren't.
Of course, most of the 'moderates' I know are moderate by the MSM definition: viscerally opposed to the right, but to call themselves liberal would be too constraining.
By moderate, I refer to who the media considers moderate, and anyone who calls themself a moderate.
I tend to respect self-proclaimed liberals more than self-proclaimed moderates with few exceptions. At least I know where the liberal stands when push comes to shove.
"'but have been brainwashed into believing that conservatives are meanspirited, closeminded, and bad'
Right, because conservatives never do anything to fuel these stereotypes..."
Sure there are conservatives who are mean people, just as there are liberals who are mean people. But that doesn't mean the stereotype of conservatives as mean is accurate or that the policies advocated by most conservatives are deserving of the popular stereotype. I know many people who call themselves moderates yet agree with the traditional conservative position a good 3/4 of the time or more, but they think if you call yourself a conservative, you are a bad person. That's not justified.
I agree. If you have religious convictions, moral convictions, or even just foundational principles, you aren't/can't be moderate. The hallmark of a moderate is the willingness to settle for a comprise on anything. If you are able to stand firm, then you aren't moderate.
Guess I'm a moderate, then....
Moderates have convicitions.
They usually get them after indictments.
Thanks for this.......and everyone else's comments also. I very much agree that a huge number of liberals call themselves "moderates" out of embarrassment, just as WinOne4TheGipper says. Excellent!
Note Thomas Sowell's super article in JWR for April 5th. Title: Liberal attitudes
His thesis is that modern liberalism has become a set of attitudes. I agree with Sowell.
Excerpts
"Liberals may think of themselves as people who believe in certain principles but, if you observe their actual behavior, you are likely to discover that most liberals have a certain set of attitudes, rather than principles.
Liberals may denounce "greed," for example, but in practice it all depends on whose greed. Nothing the government does is ever likely to be called "greed" by liberals.
"Diversity" has become one of the crusades of liberals, especially academic liberals. But, in a country that is pretty closely divided politically, it is not at all uncommon to find a whole academic department -- sociology, for example -- without a single Republican today or for the past three decades."
"Among liberals' most cherished views of themselves is that they are in favor of promoting the well-being of minorities in general and blacks in particular. But here again, it all depends on which segments of the minority community are involved.
Black welfare recipients or even black criminals have received great amounts of liberal political and journalistic support over the years. However, the great majority of blacks, who are neither criminals nor welfare recipients but are in fact their main victims, have their interests subordinated to the interests of their unsavory neighbors who are more in vogue in liberal circles."
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/ts20050405.shtml
In the 2000 GOP race, there was one candidate, who wanted to raise minimum wage, link human and civil rights to free trade, opposed flat tax, consumption taxes, and big tax cuts, he also was opposed to privatizing social security.
His name was Gary Bauer.
I have yet to see him classified as anything other then right wing, conservative, or far right wing.
His views on economics and finance were at best populist, at worst, downright liberal, and he is still called a "right wing nut".
BINGO. Very well put, delacoert! Thanks. You're right on the mark.
No. That is a Libertarian.
Ditto! :o)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.