[Paul C. Jesup]

scripter and his disciples want to paint anyone who disagrees with them as pro-homosexual agenda. They ignore the fact that those people may not support homosexual curriculuum, NAMBLA, sex with children, flamboyant public displays and the like. If anyone here whispers a positive word about homosexuals, they are accused of supporting the agenda. As I have done and will contiue to do, I support the rights of homosexuals as individual US citizens and taxpayers and I post examples of people I know who are good, productive and not radical. This is what makes the zealots mad.

This is a well thought out logical post. Good job.

[scripter]

If anyone here whispers a positive word about homosexuals, they are accused of supporting the agenda.

Is it possible to provide examples? If not past examples, would you please point this out to me in the future so we can talk about specifics?