I realize asking him to support his arguments is a complete waste of time, but you ask a good question... Perhaps I bother for the lurkers. That, and he gives me another chance to get the truth out there.
I first engaged him when he was constantly posting a long list of research links on every thread about homosexuals.
I read the first two links and pointed out to him why the research findings were false and/or the method flawed in accordance with scientific standards of research. I gave himn a brief primer on those standards and suggested he educate himself, since he was so determined to post research.
His response was to ignore what I told him about the research he posted and challenged me to post counter research findings. His challenge was a deflection from the point that he was excoriating all homosexuals by posting false research. And he assumed that there was counter research for each of his links. If he was interested in truth he would have acknowledged the problems with his links.
At that point I realized he didn't give a damn about truth he was merely in the mudslinging business and intended to indulge in emotional zealotry.
scripter and his disciples want to paint anyone who disagrees with them as pro-homosexual agenda. They ignore the fact that those people may not support homosexual curriculuum, NAMBLA, sex with children, flamboyant public displays and the like. If anyone here whispers a positive word about homosexuals, they are accused of supporting the agenda. As I have done and will contiue to do, I support the rights of homosexuals as individual US citizens and taxpayers and I post examples of people I know who are good, productive and not radical. This is what makes the zealots mad.