Replies

"Yes wait to find out if everything you heard for the past 2 days was true. Well, guess what. Apparently it wasn't. Your WND and that idiot Glenn Beck seems to have missed some critical information such as the Monday hearing in which all parties were present, and all parties reached an agreement."

All parties did not reach an agreement - the judge made a ruling that was most favorable to the granddaughter that doesn't have a legal POA as opposed to the brother and sister that do.

"Apparently you don't know much of anything."

I wrote: "My God! If this isn't a case that deserves a temporary reprieve until all is investigated then I don't know what the F@$K is." Your reply isn't a factual refutation but a simple, sweeping conclusion.

"Well, you look at my postings all you want. What you won't find are cheap insults, idiotic rants, baseless charges, and mindless bloviating, such as you have displayed."

I'd say a statement like "Apparently you don't know much of anything" would qualify as a cheap insult, a baseless charge and a one-sentence mindless bloviation

"But then, I didn't know you were one of the board moderators. BTW, are they aware of your language problems?"

So are you saying the board moderators are engaged in "...cheap insults, idiotic rants, baseless charges, and mindless bloviating"?

"As for my soul, please keep your fundamentalism to yourself, since considering your use of language above, it's your soul you may want to try and find."

There is nothing fundamentalist about supporting life even if only half of the posted story were true facts. If you don't believe in God, fine, that is ultimately your choice. As to my language, using symbols to substitute letters is perfectly legal on this board that I know of; I've seen swear words wearing no clothes get through but I don't do that. Using symbols is the equivalent of saying "fiddlesticks" or "fudge" for the "F word". And let say very emphatically that God understands passion especially when it comes to the willing termination of an innocent person. Your casual disregard for an understanding of how precarious one's life is when a judge in civil court, with civil standards of proof is able to make life and death decisions is not a position one should tread lightly. Taking it out of the Godly realm, the question is, "Where is your heart?"

All parties did not reach an agreement - the judge made a ruling that was most favorable to the granddaughter that doesn't have a legal POA as opposed to the brother and sister that do.

When the extremist lynch mob on this board got started on Thursday based on a WND report that failed to note the Monday hearing results, some of us here urged caution, but no, Gaddy and the judge were declared Godless murderers and every sort of absurdity was charged. Of course as it turns out there was an agreement to have a 3 doctor panel review granny's case and make a recommendation as to her condition and prognosis, whereupon, as I understand it, the recommendation resulted in her being moved from the hospice to a hospital, presumably for a surgical procedure.

Further, according to reports, Gaddy and the other family members hugged (that being on Monday), after the signed agreement from all parties. Nor did WND report that in fact Gaddy had been hand feeding granny all this time. Nor were you interested in where these so called loving family members were for the ten years that Gaddy had been caring for granny.

So while all of this was going on as it should have been, the nutcases were out of the woodwork screaming for justice, and condemning those of us here who simply asked if WND had reported everything correctly.

I wrote: "My God! If this isn't a case that deserves a temporary reprieve until all is investigated then I don't know what the F@$K is." Your reply isn't a factual refutation but a simple, sweeping conclusion.

So apparently your legal conclusions about the need for a temporary reprieve were baseless as the judge was in fact doing his job, isn't that correct? And all of this without the need for all of the extremist rants.

I'd say a statement like "Apparently you don't know much of anything" would qualify as a cheap insult, a baseless charge and a one-sentence mindless bloviation

Given the whole story, it would appear that you knew little to nothing about what was going on here and simply ran off half cocked like so many of your bretheren, while lambasting and disparaging those of us who urged caution. I would say that one sentence mindless bloviation fits you perfectly in this case.

So are you saying the board moderators are engaged in "...cheap insults, idiotic rants, baseless charges, and mindless bloviating"?

Only if you're a board moderator, in which case then, yes. But the mods I have seen doing their jobs appear to be doing them quite well, so you may not be sufficiently qualified.

There is nothing fundamentalist about supporting life even if only half of the posted story were true facts. If you don't believe in God, fine, that is ultimately your choice.

That's what I love about the extremist whackos, if you ask questions first, you obviously don't support life or believe in God. In other words, to people like you, either you believe in life, or you believe in finding out the truth first. Apparently you can't be both. I don't wave my faith in other people's faces like some like some here enjoy doing.

As to my language, using symbols to substitute letters is perfectly legal on this board that I know of; I've seen swear words wearing no clothes get through but I don't do that.

If you can't get through a logical debate without the use of swear words, then I will try and overlook such shortcomings.

Using symbols is the equivalent of saying "fiddlesticks" or "fudge" for the "F word".

No, its simply a way of saying the "F" word and getting by the standards of the board. Let's not compound your mistakes with hypocrisy too.

Taking it out of the Godly realm, the question is, "Where is your heart?"

As this case proves, a good heart needs to be commingled with a good dose of common sense.

The bottom line here is that nothing that WND or Glenn Beck, or the lynch mob here did had the slightest impact on the resolution of the Mae Magouirk case. You simply gave a good laugh to the leftist boards, and made complete fools of yourselves.