Replies

I never noticed this poster before this morning when suddenly I was read the riot act and condemned to hell for something I never did.

I asked the mummy to substantiate the charges, but I got no response.

I have to agree with the coward assertion, but I'll have to add the liar assertion, since the creature continues to attack without evidence.

"I never noticed this poster before this morning when suddenly I was read the riot act and condemned to hell for something I never did."

I'm sorry I didn't ping you. I've read plenty of your posts recently, saw who you posted to in agreement ie. you support their position, in this thread, so I know where you stand on the issue. I did not condemn you to hell but implied your soul is troubled if it is somehow outrageous to passionately err on the side of life whether it be at the beginning or the end of the journey.

"I asked the mummy to substantiate the charges, but I got no response."

You posted three hours after my post. I moved on to other threads.

"I have to agree with the coward assertion, but I'll have to add the liar assertion, since the creature continues to attack without evidence."

How could "this creature" lie if I "attack(s) without evidence"? I could be wrong; I could have incorrect facts; I could have missed some facts. But I didn't lie. To me, in regards to the "end of life" issue, it is a lie to say that everything is hunk-dory when a granddaughter without a medical POA places a non-vegetative, non-terminal heart patient with a living will with clear stipulations to continue life absent comatose, vegetative circumstances, into a hospice, has a granddaughter, without legal authority, demand and get immediate denial of water/nutrition while the hospice's legal department states, later, that they had erred, then the hospice official states for the media that the client was receiving "excellent care", the legal POA by the brother/sister is recognized, nutrition restored, judge declares granddaughter temporary guardianship, granddaughter attempts to remove nutrition again but is denied and then have the likes of you say I have no evidence to support my view?

You can disagree with me, say I'm a coward all you want but as far as I am concerned, it is a lie to say that under such circumstances this woman wanted/should be starved to death.