Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: supercat
Is the Saint Petersburg Times a conservative publication? Or should I regard their use of the 'conservative' label to be comparable to that of the newsmedia's appellation of 'conservative Rep. Gary Condit'?

I guess you can take it anyway you want. The quote, however, was attributed to a long time friend of Greer's. In another article earlier, I did read that Greer considers himself a conservative Christian. Again, I doubt if you could attribute a pro-death descriptor to all of the 40 plus judges in this case. If Greer complied with Florida law as he claims, then he is by definition a constructionist or conservative judge. If he felt the laws were bad, and so ruled, wouldn't he then be classified as activist?

596 posted on 04/09/2005 1:48:33 PM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies ]


To: MACVSOG68
I guess you can take it anyway you want. The quote, however, was attributed to a long time friend of Greer's.

I've known of a number of people who call themselves "conservatives", and whose allies call them "conservative", who are barely--if at all--to the right of Charles Schumer. If someone calls themself my friend, does that make them so?

In another article earlier, I did read that Greer considers himself a conservative Christian.

I'm sure Castro, Mugabe, or Hussein would probably describe themselves in glowing terms also.

Again, I doubt if you could attribute a pro-death descriptor to all of the 40 plus judges in this case. If Greer complied with Florida law as he claims, then he is by definition a constructionist or conservative judge. If he felt the laws were bad, and so ruled, wouldn't he then be classified as activist?

Greer acted in many cases with what could, at best, be described as wanton disregard for whether his 'findings of fact' corresponded with reality. As such, I find it difficult to say he 'followed the law'.

As a hypothetical, suppose that someone appeared before Judge Greer with a 'will' written on a cocktail napkin, supposedly by a recently-deceased relative, which gave all the person's assets to the person presenting it. Numerous handwriting experts found that the writing on the 'will' looked nothing like the relative's writing but a lot like that of the named 'heir'. One handwriting 'expert' said that the 'will' was written with the same color blue ink as the decedent sometimes used.

Under such circumstances, would it be legal for Judge Greer to award the decedent's entire estate to the 'heir' named on the cocktail-napkin 'will'?

597 posted on 04/09/2005 2:14:32 PM PDT by supercat ("Though her life has been sold for corrupt men's gold, she refuses to give up the ghost.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 596 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson