Yes. Time does move forward, and events do develop.
As for the doctors making a determination whether or not Mae is terminal, I read the article differently. The article says,
Under the terms of an April 4 court order, La Grange cardiologists James Brennan and Thomas Gore, and Dr. Raed Aquel, of UAB Medical Center, Birmingham, are to evaluate Magouirk and decide what treatment would be best and where it should take place.
I suppose one can read that as implying first a determination of whether or not her condition is terminal, but the usual course (as is being taken with Mae's sister) is to decice between surgical procedures and medication procedures. In other words, the assumption being that her condition is not presently terminal.
I think it is agreed that the judge's order includes an order for "proper nutrition." But there are conflicting reports as to whether or not Mae is receiving an amount of nutrition necessary to maintain her body. The nephew's reported e-mail post-dated the order, I think, and in the e-mail he asserts that Mae was [at that moment] not being properly nurished.
I do agree that this is so far a non-story. No major media have picked it up, so the non-story status is self-evident.
Right now, proper nutrition is most likely the important issue. I assume the hospice now has the judges order, and will take it seriously.
BTW, on another point, the LaGrange News reports that the other party along with Gaddy is the grandson, and I can find no other references to more than one sister, and it seems clear that the one sister is in the Mullinax camp.