However, Gaddy and her brother, Michael Shane Magouirk, obtained an emergency injunction from Troup County Probate Judge Douglas Boyd to prevent the planned air transport.
I read that article after I posted the question about Mae's sister siding with Gaddy. I'm not sure what relation Michael Shane Magouirk is to Mae, but a casual read is that he is Gaddy's sister, i.e. is a grandson.
I'm curious about the strong sentiment that the new WND article represent a strong backtrack of some sort. IT appears to have the same general allegation that Gaddy wrongly commited her grandma to hospice; wrongly ordered withholding of nutrition and hydration; and hustled to a court to obtain legal guardianship while Mae's siblings were attempting to restore intubation. And none of the report clarify the timeline of intubation instigation, removal, restoration, etc.
Try to answer!
Well it seems to now admit that the starving may not be taking place, which was the hot button for most here. It now discusses the second hearing which would lead to the conclusion that everyone was involved and that Gaddy had a very limited guardianship order, and that the real issue may just be whether Mae is to be transported to another location or remain in the hospice. One reads from that, that the doctors assigned will determine if she is terminal and the extent of any medical needs. The judge, it seems has ordered Gaddy to ensure proper nutrition. It appears that the judge has things under control, at least temporarily. It appears far different from the intital read.