[Shethink13]

In this case there is clear and pertinent infomation that this woman should have the tube inserted and that it would be consistent with her wishes.

I was on the other side of the Shaivo case, but this case is disturbing.

You believe there was "clear and pertinent information" that Terri wanted to be starved to death? What if this woman didn't have a living will? Which side would you have been on then?

[rwilson99]

Well in this case there is no clear guardian, such as a husband, and a living will that clearly states the woman's wishes.

I'm just following the facts, the law and the constitution.

Let me ask you a question.

Where is the federal role in making family medical decisions found in the constitution?

Answer: It's in the same place where the founding father's grated a right to abortion.