Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: k2blader

That's why I said SOME. I have read nasty, vile stuff about anyone who doesn't fit SOME people's definition of pro-life (not this thread per se, many Schiavo ones and such). I am saddened that it seems to be okay to hate if LIFE is involved. Some invoke the word and stiffle any discussion and I think there is ego gratification involved.

I know many have pure beliefs and ambitions, hence the SOME.


409 posted on 04/08/2005 4:17:27 PM PDT by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies ]


To: pa mom; k2blader
That's why I said SOME. I have read nasty, vile stuff about anyone who doesn't fit SOME people's definition of pro-life (not this thread per se, many Schiavo ones and such). I am saddened that it seems to be okay to hate if LIFE is involved. Some invoke the word and stifle any discussion and I think there is ego gratification involved.

Hey folks, excuse me for saying this but:

Over the past weeks (Terri and now this) a lot of people have been getting very angry and many have gotten hurt and disturbed by all the "pro-life" and not "pro-life people. Is it possible to try to keep the dogma out of this and just speak to the specifics of the particular case? Can't we just address how this woman is being treated and leave all the "politics" out of it? It's really fundamentally about this 81 year old woman and a granddaughter who looks like she may have become tired of taking care of her grandmother.

Sorry, I had to interject that.

473 posted on 04/09/2005 3:42:57 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Advanced Directive -- don't step on my blue suede shoes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson