Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

I wonder why Lloyds does not required an armed crew/ship. I would think a Bofors system could be adapted to deal with these situations.


16 posted on 04/06/2005 9:01:16 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Liberalism: The irrational fear of self reliance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Straight Vermonter
I wonder why Lloyds does not required an armed crew/ship. I would think a Bofors system could be adapted to deal with these situations.

Standard policy is not to resist at all. Though I think water cannons have been used some.

17 posted on 04/06/2005 9:03:15 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Straight Vermonter
I wonder why Lloyds does not required an armed crew/ship. I would think a Bofors system could be adapted to deal with these situations.

..or a number of movable re-loadable "claymore mine" dispensers/6 barreled Gatling MGs controlled by specially trained crew-members...

or several small heavily-armed high-speed boats following the pirates back to their villages and destroy the these "nests".

53 posted on 04/07/2005 5:51:20 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson