Ok, you win, just keep on posting your questions to cast aspersions on Jim all day long every day.
I will not bother getting into a discussion with you again - you are using our defense of Jim to clutter up these threads with your questions.
I would suggest you freepmail Mr. Robinson and quit bothering the threads, but, of course, that does not allow you to post insinuations does it? That would be private - and you would never want private.
Note: To any new people reading these questions (why you would I have no idea - wish I had not): There are people that continually ask these same questions on every fund drive. They seem to believe that unless they know exactly the salary of the creator, owner and maintainer of this wonderful site, there is a dark undercurrent.
Since when does a man have to reveal his salary on a private creation that users can use or not freely? Since when must a man endure insinuations of abuse of funds freely given with no strings attached?
This is a wonderful site and Mr. Robinson has provided for our use or not, we can contribute or not. Most of us get far more from the site than the amount being contributed.
I personally thank him for having the grace to give us this site and to even allow posting rights to those that want to cause him harm.
I've cast no aspersions - I've merely asked a single, simple question, for which I am still waiting to hear a cogent answer. It does not appear that you know the answer, but I thank you for your time and I am glad you have had the opportunity to express your concerns, even if I do not share them.
I would suggest you freepmail Mr. Robinson and quit bothering the threads, but, of course, that does not allow you to post insinuations does it? That would be private - and you would never want private.
Well, if I had posted any insinuations, you might be correct, but as I haven't, I would say that your theory about what motivates me needs some work. As for Mr. Robinson, he has been pinged to this thread several times as part of others' responses to me, and I have no doubt that if he chooses to answer, he will do so in the fashion he finds appropriate.
Since when does a man have to reveal his salary on a private creation that users can use or not freely? Since when must a man endure insinuations of abuse of funds freely given with no strings attached?
Since never. I never asked for his salary. I never insinuated anything, much less abuse of funds - I merely asked what this particular set of funds was for. Really, if you cannot read and respond to my posts without misrepresenting them, I fear we're not going to be able to continue this dicussion, you and I.