Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl; PatrickHenry; js1138

Must be a slow day, but this is important stuff.

I think in PH's and js's list there must be a bold and all cap treatment of "provisionally"

I know of Nobel prize winners that have been flat wrong. They have also been "big" enough to admit it. Accepting something from "X", provisionally is an important part of how we build our knowledge bases, because it's just not possible to do or know everything. But, as "X" may not purposely lead you into a dark alley, we should always have our eyes open, even with the most trustworthy sources, and that includes theological sources (maybe even more so since their history is long, and suspect in some cases, and their early oral traditions leave a lot of doors open). Every man is capable of making mistakes. I know I have made many and expect to make many more.

(As you all might guess, I have trouble with authority figures, no matter how BIG they are) 8^)


47 posted on 04/06/2005 1:15:08 PM PDT by furball4paws (Ho, Ho, Beri, Beri and Balls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: furball4paws
I think in PH's and js's list there must be a bold and all cap treatment of "provisionally"

Agreed. You may mentally append that to everything I claim to know. Well, almost everything. I exist, that's for sure. And A is A. Always will be.

63 posted on 04/06/2005 3:05:05 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: furball4paws; PatrickHenry; Ichneumon; StJacques; donh; betty boop
Kudos, furball4paws! You have a very engaging sidebar going with some really big thinkers.

All I can add to the side discussion is that Einstein in his book Relativity gave a considerable nod to Descartes:

We shall see later, however, that the general theory of relativity confirms Descartes' conception in a roundabout way. What brought Descartes to his remarkably attractive view was certainly the feeling that, without compelling necessity, one ought not to ascribe reality to a thing like space, which is not capable of being "directly experienced". [This expression is to be taken cum grano salis.]

He continues by explaining Descartes' aversion to space being considered independent of physical objects, i.e. space without matter. And of course, relativity and inflationary theory show us that space/time is created as the universe expands.

It is interesting to meditate on Descartes' sense of physical reality in light of Descartes' sense of existence cogito ergo sum (I think therefore I am).

It makes me wonder how often we put the cart before the horse ...

154 posted on 04/06/2005 9:54:36 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl (Please donate monthly to Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson